Dual Role of Leadership in ‘Janus-Faced' Telework from Home

The ‘forced' telework from home during the pandemic changed the practices, routines, and especially the working contexts of many employees in a leadership position as leaders themselves became teleworkers in addition to those they were expected to lead. This chapter looks at the challenges and resources of working from home (WFH)-and their ambivalences-among teleworkers and teleworking leaders during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data was collected immediately after the lockdown. From this data, two subsets were filtered. First, the responses of teleworkers (N = 228) and, second, of teleworking leaders (N = 195) were identified and analysed in regard to the ‘the most challenging' and ‘the most rewarding' issues when working from home. The study shows that telework from home is ‘Janus-faced': telework is simultaneously challenging and rewarding in several respects. In addition, teleworking leaders have a dual role, as they must both adapt to working at home as teleworkers themselves and to being leaders of homeworkers. The findings can be used for designing, organizing, performing, and leading hybrid work in the future. In this evolving ʼnew normal, ' leaders need to adapt to their dual role, learn new leadership competencies, and encourage their employees to lead themselves. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.

‘Cocooning' in prison during COVID-19: Findings from recent research in Ireland

The advent of COVID-19 prompted the enforced isolation of elderly and vulnerable populations around the world, for their own safety. For people in prison, these restrictions risked compounding the isolation and harm they experienced. At the same time, the pandemic created barriers to prison oversight when it was most needed to ensure that the state upheld the rights and wellbeing of those in custody. This article reports findings from a unique collaboration in Ireland between the Office of the Inspector of Prisons – a national prison oversight body – and academic criminologists. Early in the pandemic, they cooperated to hear the voices of people ‘cocooning' – isolated because of their advanced age or a medical vulnerability – in Irish prisons by providing journals to this cohort, analysing the data, and encouraging the Irish Prison Service to change practices accordingly. The findings indicated that ‘cocooners' were initially ambivalent about these new restrictions, both experiencing them as a punishment akin to solitary confinement, and understanding the goal of protection. As time passed, however, participants reported a drastic impact on their mental and physical health, and implications for their (already limited) agency and relationships with others, experienced more or less severely depending on staff and management practices. The paper also discusses the implications for prison practices during and following the pandemic, understanding isolation in the penological context, and collaboration between prison oversight bodies and academics.

"I Could Be Unemployed the Rest of the Year”: Unprecedented Times and the Challenges of "Making More”

The COVID-19 pandemic has been unprecedented in many ways, but perhaps no more so than in the sudden expansion of—and increase in—unemployment assistance benefits. We ask how precarious workers, many of whom were "hustling” for money or engaged in creative fields, feel about making more on unemployment. How are they using the funds? We draw on remote interviews and online surveys with 199 gig and precarious workers in New York City during the first wave of the pandemic. We find that workers are ambivalent about unemployment assistance and concerned that a financial influx today portends a shortage tomorrow. This "specter of the unknown” affected workers' use of their benefits. As a result, even though the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act was intended to mitigate the social and economic impact of the pandemic, these programs—despite being helpful—may have also contributed to precarious workers becoming even more certain of their insecurity.

Afraid but misinformed: Conspiracist beliefs cancel the positive influence of fear of COVID-19 on vaccination intentions - Findings from a Romanian sample.

Understanding the factors that make people more likely to refuse vaccination against COVID-19 is crucial in order to design public health messages efficient in increasing vaccination rates. As COVID-19 creates risks of seriously damaging health effects, fear of this disease is as a significant determinant of vaccination intentions, as indicated by past research. Nevertheless, this positive influence may be limited in people who do not consider vaccines as a solution to protect against COVID-19, especially those who hold conspiracist beliefs about the new coronavirus and, implicitly, about the newly developed vaccines. The present study examined in a cross-sectional design on a convenience sample (N = 564) the joint effect of fear of COVID-19 and conspiracist beliefs on vaccination intentions, advancing past research on their independent influences. Furthermore, we investigated and controlled the effects of perceived risk of catching COVID-19, trust in medical experts, attitude towards vaccination and socio-demographical characteristics (i.e., gender, age, and education), previously found to be associated to COVID-19 vaccination intentions. We also tested the effect of ambivalence towards vaccination, i.e., the degree to which people simultaneously hold positive and negative evaluations of this intervention, as the widespread misinformation on the new coronavirus and its vaccines may induce ambivalence on this latter issue in many people. The results showed that the positive effect of fear of COVID-19 on vaccination intentions emerged only in participants who tend not to endorse conspiracist ideas on the new coronavirus. Moreover, higher vaccine hesitancy was found in participants with higher ambivalence towards vaccination, in those who perceive the risk of being contaminated by the new coronavirus as low, and in those with more negative attitudes towards vaccines in general. Vaccine ambivalence also emerged as a mediator of the negative effects of conspiracist beliefs about COVID-19 on vaccination intentions. This pattern of findings suggests the public messages emphasizing the risks of COVID-19 should also combat misinformation in order to maximize vaccine uptake.

Ambivalent thinking amid pandemic biopolitics

This review article surveys recent work in political theory that has brought together biopolitics and the COVID-19 pandemic. Centered on 2021 books by Giorgio Agamben and Benjamin Bratton, the essay outlines prominent visions of "negative" (Agamben) and "positive" (Bratton) biopolitical responses to the pandemic, engages public reactions to these approaches, and reassesses the position of biopolitical thinking in light of these. In doing so, the article recalls the foundations and original interventions of biopolitical theory, calling for a renewed engagement with the perspectives afforded by biopolitics that pushes past the negative/positive binary. Ultimately, the essay gathers together major developments in biopolitical thinking today, counters moves to discard the theoretical approach despite the limitations of recent examples, and repositions biopolitics as an ambivalent tool for political thought and practice going forward.

How Does Multinational Corporations' CSR Influence Purchase Intention? The Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism and Consumer Ambivalence

Given the increasingly strained relationship between humans and the environment, green marketing has become a necessity for the sustainable development of society. In this context, this paper seeks to explore the influence of multinational enterprises' green marketing behavior on Chinese consumers' green consumption willingness. Through reviewing the related theories and deeply analyzing multinational corporations' CSR, a theoretical model of multinational corporations' CSR and consumer purchase intention has been built in this paper based on consumers' perceptions. The paper provides empirical research on the multinational corporations' CSR, corporate image, consumer ambivalence, and purchase intention, and offers a hypothesis of the relationship between the four. Consumer ethnocentrism can significantly negatively regulate the relationship between corporate image and consumers' willingness to buy and further negatively regulate the process of establishing the corporate social responsibility system of multinational corporations.

Antecedents to Consumers' Green Hotel Stay Purchase Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The influence of green consumption value, emotional ambivalence, and consumers' perceptions.

When traveling for tourism purposes during the COVID-19 pandemic, some consumers might want to stay at green hotels because of these products' images and practices. At the same time, these green establishments also need consumer support to remain in business once the virus is under control. This study explores green hotels' challenges and opportunities by examining the factors that contribute to consumers' green hotel stay purchase behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 429 participants completed questionnaires, and the answers revealed that consumers' perceived health risks and green hotels' perceived persuasiveness can affect their emotional ambivalence that, in turn, can affect their green purchase behavior of hotel stays. Furthermore, the relationship between emotional ambivalence and purchase behavior can be moderated by consumers' green consumption values. The findings of this research contribute to the tourism literature and green product consumption research. In addition, implications for green hotel practitioners are discussed.

Party Identification, Ambivalence, and the Issue of Vaccine Procurement in Taiwan

After the Covid-19 pandemic began to wreak havoc around the world in January 2020, Taiwan managed to stay mostly Covid-free due to swift and efficient action taken by the government to contain the outbreak. However, after the country experienced its first significant wave of domestically transmitted cases in May 2021, vaccines became a highly salient issue because Taiwan did not have enough doses to immunize all its citizens. In this study, we investigate how Taiwanese appraise the government's overall efforts to acquire vaccines. We hypothesize that, apart from a partisan divergence of opinions, some citizens would hold ambivalent attitudes toward the way the government handled the vaccine procurement process. Results from multivariate regression analysis indicate that the effect of party identification on evaluations of government is conditionally dependent on citizens' level of ambivalence. Specifically, increased ambivalence offsets the strong effect of party affiliation on government evaluation, especially for political independents and supporters of opposition parties.

Sensemaking in-between the known and the unknown: Narratives of immigrant entrepreneurs in the United States

In today's hyperconnected, fast-changing environment, where uncertainty is the only certainty, individuals often find themselves in ambiguity, in-between the known and the unknown times and spaces. During ambiguous transitions, individuals deliberately engage in a cognitive process to make sense of their circumstances by generating the stories of who they are and what is happening. These stories ongoingly update a mental map that enacts a more ordered environment under liminality. This qualitative research collected and analyzed the narratives of 20 relatively resourceful immigrant entrepreneurs in the United States to explore their sensemaking during immigration, entrepreneurship, and the COVID-19 pandemic. This purposeful sampling was informed by the concept of the hybrid identity of immigrants and the emerging evidence that some resourceful immigrant entrepreneurs rely on diverse repertoires of approaches to travel across the complexity of multilayered cultural and institutional contexts. By exploring the sensemaking narratives of these immigrant entrepreneurs, the study investigated how they navigated the tensions in-between two spaces (home culture and host culture) and two times (pre-COVID-19 and during prolonged COVID-19). As a result, this study excavated detailed cognitive processes (mental dialogues weaving different elements into a holistic narrative), influencing factors (backgrounds and surroundings), and characteristics (disequilibrium, ambivalence, and randomness) of sensemaking in uncertainty and ambiguity with rich empirical accounts. Furthermore, the investigation resulted in three overarching findings. First, the study detangled multilayered contextual factors at three levels-global/national/regional, community/institutional, and family/individual-dynamically influencing immigrant entrepreneurs. Second, the study found insights into immigrant entrepreneurs' identity and strategies for navigating continuous changes. Identity was constructed with both solid and fluid stories of participants' values/beliefs, self-evaluations, feelings, and sense of belonging. Immigrant entrepreneurs switched on different modes of actions (develop, strive, quest, create, reflect, and retreat) and strategies (hybrid, match & connect, niche, flow, and bricolage) to respond to changing contexts. Intellectual humility facilitated the cognitive process of immigrant entrepreneurs in shifting their approaches. Third, the study highlighted the narrative mode of thinking, allowing participants to resolve identity paralysis and integrate ambivalence using metaphors and dialectical sequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Question wording and attitudinal ambivalence: COVID, the economy, and Americans' response to a real-life trolley problem

Objective: As the coronavirus pandemic raged throughout 2020, political leaders faced a difficult choice: Should strict social distancing guidelines be maintained until the threat posed by COVID-19 was diminished enough for citizens to return to their regular activities? Or was the economic disruption caused by the pandemic something that was, according to President Trump, "worse than the problem itself"? Methods: We analyze data from a 2020 survey of registered voters. Results: Democrats were more likely than Republicans to resolve the tradeoff in favor of maintaining social distancing over rebuilding the economy. More importantly, we find that when faced with this moral dilemma (measured by one's choice between a utilitarian vs. a deontological approach when confronted with a real-life "trolley problem"), many citizens from both sides of the partisan aisle were of two minds on the subject. Conclusion: Americans are ambivalent about the appropriate government response to COVID-19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Family Relations of University Students in Times of Pandemic by COVID-19: Feelings and Tensions

Objective: The objective of this research was to reveal the feelings and tensions that characterize the family relationships of university students in times of pandemic and confinement conditions due to COVID-19. Method(s): The method was qualitative, and the feelings and tensions in the family and educational context of 584 university students were evaluated, from a qualitative proposal and a hermeneutic approach, anchored to the question: How have the affective manifestations been, in terms of feelings and tensions, in the family relationships of university students, academically active, in the Caribbean Region of Colombia, during the mandatory confinement process derived from the COVID 19 pandemic? The methodological design was structured from the concepts of the Grounded Theory, applied to the data obtained through virtual techniques and instruments, such as an online survey. The organization of the information to generate the results was made from descriptive, analytical and interpretive coding, supported by matrices and theoretical maps. Results and Discussion: There are feelings and tensions in three directions: Negative Feelings (in tension) such as anxiety, stress and depression;positive feelings, joy, adaptation and ambiguous feelings, which show ambivalence and variability, which are reflected in family relationships and three senses: They have improved, remain the same and have worsened, according to each type, dynamics and characteristics of the family, associated with gender, coping mechanisms and socioeconomic level. Conclusion(s): Families were transformed due to the pandemic, and relationships and interactions were found that exacerbated tensions or factors of protection and care among family members, with emotional overload, with stress from work and study.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccines: Protective Shields or Threatening Risks? A Descriptive Exploratory Study among the Italian Population.

Although several quantitative studies have explored vaccine hesitancy, qualitative research on the factors underlying attitudes toward vaccination is still lacking. To fill this gap, this study aimed to investigate the general perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among the Italian population with a qualitative approach. The sample included 700 Italian participants who completed an online survey. Open questions underwent a descriptive analysis for unveiling meaning categories, while differences in the prevalence of categories were calculated using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Vaccination was associated with the following seven main themes: 'safety', 'healthcare', 'vaccine delivery', 'progress', 'ambivalence', 'mistrust', and 'ethics'. Vaccinated individuals more frequently reported words related to the safety theme (χ2 = 46.7, p < 0.001), while unvaccinated individuals more frequently reported words related to mistrust (χ2 = 123, p < 0.001) and ambivalence (χ2 = 48.3, p < 0.001) themes. Working in the healthcare sector and being younger than 40 years affected the general perceptions of vaccination in terms of pro-vaccine attitudes. Unvaccinated individuals were more affected by the negative experiences of their acquaintances and manifested more distrust of scientific researchers, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies than vaccinated individuals. These findings suggest promoting collaborative efforts of governments, health policymakers, and media sources, including social media companies, in order to deal with cognitions and emotions supporting vaccine hesitancy.

Ambivalent thinking amid pandemic biopolitics

This review article surveys recent work in political theory that has brought together biopolitics and the COVID-19 pandemic. Centered on 2021 books by Giorgio Agamben and Benjamin Bratton, the essay outlines prominent visions of "negative” (Agamben) and "positive” (Bratton) biopolitical responses to the pandemic, engages public reactions to these approaches, and reassesses the position of biopolitical thinking in light of these. In doing so, the article recalls the foundations and original interventions of biopolitical theory, calling for a renewed engagement with the perspectives afforded by biopolitics that pushes past the negative/positive binary. Ultimately, the essay gathers together major developments in biopolitical thinking today, counters moves to discard the theoretical approach despite the limitations of recent examples, and repositions biopolitics as an ambivalent tool for political thought and practice going forward. © The Author(s) 2022.

Clinician Experiences Related to Requests for Ivermectin and Healthcare Distrust in the Rural South

INTRODUCTION: Ivermectin has been widely requested or prescribed as treatment for COVID-19 despite NIH and WHO recommendations against its use. Even so, clinicians commonly receive requests for unproven COVID-19 therapies (UCTs) and face substantial disruption to the therapeutic alliance when clinicians deny these requests from patients. METHOD(S): This study was conducted from 2021-2022 in Moultrie, Georgia. Physicians or advanced practice clinicians who treated a COVID-19-positive patient in the health system were eligible. Purposive, convenience sampling was used to recruit clinicians to participate in a 30-minute qualitative interview exploring experiences and thoughts related to UCT requests, patient trust in the healthcare system, and personal impact of distrust and UCT requests. Thematic analysis was applied to transcripts. RESULT(S): Participants were 8 clinicians (7 physicians, 1 advanced practice nurse) from several fields (outpatient setting=2, inpatient or mixed setting=6): pulmonary/critical care (n=3), internal medicine/hospitalists (n=2), nephrology (n=1), and family medicine (n=2). Five themes emerged: 1) Clinicians do not understand why people trust social media and not their clinical expertise;such distrust is hurtful and frustrating;2) Clinicians feel ambivalence about discussions about UCTs and are generally accepting of community beliefs;3) Clinicians perceived that distrust in healthcare originates outside of the healthcare system yet patients exhibit trust within the local healthcare system;4) Clinicians are torn about whether to use UCTs to build trust and rapport;5) Counseling strategies are variable yet clinicians spend significant time focusing on education. CONCLUSION(S): Clinicians experience distress related to perceived patient distrust in their recommendations about COVID-19 vaccination and UCT requests. Some clinicians perceive that acquiescing to UCT requests may help repair therapeutic relationships with minimal harm. Clinician perspectives are aligned with themes from a related study of patient trust and UCT request from the same healthcare system. Taken together, these studies provide insight for clinicians looking to craft savvy and ethical messages that are responsive to patient needs while upholding professional standards in prescribing medications.

Students' technological ambivalence toward online proctoring and the need for responsible use of educational technologies

Background Purpose Method Findings Conclusions COVID‐19 has led to an unprecedented increase in the use of technology for teaching and learning in higher education institutions (HEIs), including in engineering, computing, and technology programs. Given the urgency of the situation, technologies were often implemented with a short‐term rather than long‐term view.In this study, we investigate students' perceptions of the use of video‐based monitoring (VbM) for proctoring exams to better assess its impact on students. We leverage technological ambivalence as a framing lens to analyze students' experiences and perceptions of using VbM and draw implications for responsible use of educational technology.Qualitative data were collected from students using focus group interviews and discussion board assignments and analyzed inductively to understand students' experiences.We present a framework of how a technological shift of existing practice triggered ambivalence that manifested itself as a sustained negative outlook among students regarding the use of VbM, as well as their institution and instructors. Students accepted the inevitability of the technology but were unconvinced that the benefits of VbM outweighed its risks.As instructors use educational technologies that are inherently driven by user data and algorithms that are not transparent, it is imperative that they are attentive to the responsible use of technology. To educate future engineers who are ethically and morally responsible, engineering educators and engineering institutions need to exhibit that behavior in their own practices, starting with their use of educational technologies. [ FROM AUTHOR]

Sensemaking in-between the known and the unknown: Narratives of immigrant entrepreneurs in the United States

In today's hyperconnected, fast-changing environment, where uncertainty is the only certainty, individuals often find themselves in ambiguity, in-between the known and the unknown times and spaces. During ambiguous transitions, individuals deliberately engage in a cognitive process to make sense of their circumstances by generating the stories of who they are and what is happening. These stories ongoingly update a mental map that enacts a more ordered environment under liminality. This qualitative research collected and analyzed the narratives of 20 relatively resourceful immigrant entrepreneurs in the United States to explore their sensemaking during immigration, entrepreneurship, and the COVID-19 pandemic. This purposeful sampling was informed by the concept of the hybrid identity of immigrants and the emerging evidence that some resourceful immigrant entrepreneurs rely on diverse repertoires of approaches to travel across the complexity of multilayered cultural and institutional contexts. By exploring the sensemaking narratives of these immigrant entrepreneurs, the study investigated how they navigated the tensions in-between two spaces (home culture and host culture) and two times (pre-COVID-19 and during prolonged COVID-19). As a result, this study excavated detailed cognitive processes (mental dialogues weaving different elements into a holistic narrative), influencing factors (backgrounds and surroundings), and characteristics (disequilibrium, ambivalence, and randomness) of sensemaking in uncertainty and ambiguity with rich empirical accounts. Furthermore, the investigation resulted in three overarching findings. First, the study detangled multilayered contextual factors at three levels-global/national/regional, community/institutional, and family/individual-dynamically influencing immigrant entrepreneurs. Second, the study found insights into immigrant entrepreneurs' identity and strategies for navigating continuous changes. Identity was constructed with both solid and fluid stories of participants' values/beliefs, self-evaluations, feelings, and sense of belonging. Immigrant entrepreneurs switched on different modes of actions (develop, strive, quest, create, reflect, and retreat) and strategies (hybrid, match & connect, niche, flow, and bricolage) to respond to changing contexts. Intellectual humility facilitated the cognitive process of immigrant entrepreneurs in shifting their approaches. Third, the study highlighted the narrative mode of thinking, allowing participants to resolve identity paralysis and integrate ambivalence using metaphors and dialectical sequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Party Identification, Ambivalence, and the Issue of Vaccine Procurement in Taiwan

After the Covid-19 pandemic began to wreak havoc around the world in January 2020, Taiwan managed to stay mostly Covid-free due to swift and efficient action taken by the government to contain the outbreak. However, after the country experienced its first significant wave of domestically transmitted cases in May 2021, vaccines became a highly salient issue because Taiwan did not have enough doses to immunize all its citizens. In this study, we investigate how Taiwanese appraise the government’s overall efforts to acquire vaccines. We hypothesize that, apart from a partisan divergence of opinions, some citizens would hold ambivalent attitudes toward the way the government handled the vaccine procurement process. Results from multivariate regression analysis indicate that the effect of party identification on evaluations of government is conditionally dependent on citizens’ level of ambivalence. Specifically, increased ambivalence offsets the strong effect of party affiliation on government evaluation, especially for political independents and supporters of opposition parties. [ FROM AUTHOR]

Unraveling the effect of ambivalence over emotional expression on subjective wellbeing in Chinese college students in romantic relationships: A multiple mediation model.

The sudden and unpredictable outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has severely threatened young adults' physical and mental health and damaged the quality of relationships. As a critical stage of development, their well-being is more vulnerable to adverse environments which may lead to profound negative long-life mental health status. The current study aimed to investigate the mediation effects of fear of intimacy and attachment avoidance in the association between ambivalence over emotional expression and subjective wellbeing. A sample of 555 Chinese college students who are currently involved in romantic relationships (Mean age = 19.69, SD age = 1.36, 52% females) completed anonymous questionnaires regarding ambivalence over emotional expression, fear of intimacy, attachment avoidance, and subjective wellbeing. The findings revealed that ambivalence over emotional expression can predict negative subjective wellbeing of college students in romantic relationships significantly, and fear of intimacy and attachment avoidance played a sequentially mediating role in the association between ambivalence over emotional expression and subjective wellbeing. Surprisingly, when considering attachment avoidance independently, we found it had an inhibitory action on the link between ambivalence over emotional expression and subjective wellbeing. The present study contributes to a better understanding of how ambivalence over emotional expression can decrease subjective wellbeing, and also has implications for the intervention of students' subjective wellbeing and closeness during the period of COVID-19.

Multilateralism to the Rescue? Beijing's Support for Multilateral Institutions during the COVID-19 Crisis

[...]we explored how Chinese multilateralism evolved in two regional contexts, Africa and Latin America, through a literature review and collection of data on Beijing's actions during the COVID-19 crisis. [...]by 1989, China had joined 37 major intergovernmental organisations, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (Hoo 2018). Since its inclusion into the World Trade Organization in 2001, Beijing's foreign policy has increasingly taken on a multilateral orientation (Moore 2011, Kastner et al. 2020). On the one hand, some argue that Beijing is upholding rather than undermining a global order based on liberal principles and a set of multilateral institutions, in place since World War II, under US domination.3 As China has benefitted enormously from the traditional multilateral system, it is often viewed as a staunch defender of multilateralism as well as a norm entrepreneur contributing to the further development and evolution of multilateral cooperation (Stuenkel 2016). [...]several scholars argue that China is adding new layers to (and deepening) the so-called "crisis of multilateralism" - associated with the multiple failures of goal achievement and the flawed and undemocratic governing structures of multilateral institutions, many of which predated the rise of China (Morse / Keohane 2014, Chin 2015). [...]this crisis has been further exacerbated by the ambivalent and instrumental attitude of the United States towards international institutional

LABOUR, SELF-CARE AND RESPITE: NEOLIBERAL RATIONALITIES IN SLEEP CRISIS RHETORIC

This article tracks the emergence of sleep discourse in the past ten years in the USA, illustrating a democratisation of this rhetoric insofar as it has begun to interpellate populations beyond midlife women. Despite the sociological and demographic inequities associated with sleep deficits in marginalised populations, the much vaunted 'sleep crisis' is more widely appreciated as a distinct self-care frontier. Such behavioural scripts resonate with exaltations of the self as resilient entrepreneurial problem-solver and are linked to the broader positioning of self-care as salve for the injuries of neoliberalism. Beginning with sleep's ties to women's wellness and consumerist culture writ large, we apprehend sleep as an economy, one with staggering new commercial dimensions. Sleep remedies tend to be focused narrowly on the acquisition of products and technologies (sleep sprays, essential oils and melatonin gummies, blackout curtains, premium bedding, sleep apps, sound machines, adult sleep coaches), all of which come under consideration here. The investigation then turns to the heightened attention paid to the experience of sleep during COVID-19, discusses how sleep discourse articulates to and with a sense of ambivalent dispossession from work regimes and, finally, argues that the sleep crisis has been leveraged to intensify neoliberal brutalities.